home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.sdm.de!usenet
- From: Jens Coldewey <jens.coldewey@sdm.de>
- Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.software-eng
- Subject: Re: Comparing OMT and Booch's method
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:20:57 +0100
- Organization: sd&m GmbH & Co.KG Germany
- Message-ID: <310C9179.67FA@sdm.de>
- References: <30FD30AC.2D72@login.eunet.no> <4e6n8q$rvi@watnews2.watson.ibm.com> <4e8dla$92s@news-2.csn.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kallisto.bi.sdm.de
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (WinNT; I)
-
- Helge Minken <helgemi@login.eunet.no> wrote:
-
- > We are in the very beginning of introducing Object Oriented
- > Designs in our different instrument designs. We will to the
- > most extent use VC++ 4.
- >
- > Two design methods have been launched: The Booch method and
- > the Object Modeling Technique (OMT). Can anybody advise me of
- > which (if any) is the best chose, or if any other technique may
- > be even better. What are their pro's and con's?
- > I think Booch is better suited for technical applications while
- OMT has a strong emphasis on data modelling. But if you're not
- too much dependent on tools, think about using their joint
- 'Unified Method'. It seems to collect all advantages of either
- methods. As far as I know, Jacobson is participating too, so
- there may also be a fairly good approach to use cases. But
- there are no supporting tools by now. Contact rational.com, they
- might have more info.
-
- Jens
-
- --
- Jens Coldewey |s |d &|m | software design & management gmbh&CoKG
- | | | | Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27
- jens.coldewey@sdm.de | | | | 81737 Munich, Germany.
-